Yesterday in class we discussed the six problems of poverty
that Michael B. Katz addressed in his essay “What kind of Problem is Poverty?
The six different problems are: persons, places, resources, political economy,
power, and markets. After a short discussion of how each different problem is
important in its own way, the professor had us get into our groups to discuss
how our group projects related to one or many of the six problems of poverty.
My group’s project: Learning Important Fun Eating habits (LIFEhabits), will be
focusing on looking at obesity rates in a school district and more specifically
focusing on 8th grade middle school students. Our goal is to educate
students about the importance of eating healthy.
As we were discussing where our project’s goals would fit
under, we came to a consensus that our project problem solution fell under
resources. In Katz essay, his explanation of poverty based on resources focus a
lot on money, and how poverty is the absence of money. In our case, our group
felt that resources for us meant something more than money; it meant having the
knowledge to understand what is happening, or why things are happening. The
levels of obesity in middle schools might be the result of lack of education on
nutrition. There is no real solution to this problem is all we do is give
people money to try and change things without really analyzing the problem, and
why it keeps happening. Like one of my classmates mentioned in class. It’s like
giving homeless people money to go to the doctor, you re giving them the resource
(money) but they will not go because they will either spend the money elsewhere
or not be informed on where to go. The solution would be to taking them
ourselves. Same thing will happen with middle school children and their
schools. We can give them the money they need to change the lunch menu, but
unless the students are aware of why it is best to eat healthy foods instead of
Burgers and pizza every day, they will not eat during lunch, instead they will
continue their eating habits outside school. Is all about knowledge. At least
that is what many of us though as we started thinking about our projects. But is it really? Professor Talwalker left us
thinking about a question she wrote “is knowledge most likely conceived as a
resource, or not?” on the board.
We also said that our project fell under people. The only
solution will not only be informing students about the benefits of healthy
eating habits, but also outreaching to them and trying to change their way of
thinking. Many students do not like fruits and vegetables, and that is
understandable because most of us went through that phase. But the only way to
have these children change their way of thinking when it comes to choosing
between healthy foods and junk food, is by motivating them and once again
informing them about nutrition. At the end of the day this could be our biggest
problem, having children understand.
Finally the third category in which our project falls under
is places. For this category we are still debating whether it actually does
fall under places or not. In class our group we had agreed that it did because
where someone lives also affects their way of thinking, but after discussing as
a class, our group said that maybe it did not because we were not focusing on a
certain race, we wanted to apply our project to multiple school districts, wealthy
or not, and finally we were not going to solve this problem by moving everyone
out of their neighborhood. But when we presented our project to the class, a
classmate and professor Talkwaker both mentioned that place might actually be a
problem. Yet we are debating whether place is a solution to our problem.
Overall Katz essay was in my opinion a well-written essay
that helped us start thinking about specific problems and solutions for our
group projects that we are going to encounter along the way.
As another member of LIFEhabits, I want to share the difficulty our team experienced placing our project in these categories. First off we needed to address the problem and the solutions. It may be that the problem may be a problem of places. For example, obesity may be prevalent in a region that is predominantly lower income with a lot of easy fast food eateries and very few healthy alternatives. Although the problem may be regionally placed, we needed to address if our solution is a solution that can regionally placed. Our original plans where that since we are not changing the location (i.e we are not moving people out of the neighborhood) it cannot be a solution of place. But when we presented, the class brought out a good point that we are essentially bringing a valuable resource to a region that previously did not have so our solution could be one of place.
ReplyDeleteOverall, I just want to give another glimpse of the process and some of the challenges that members of LIFEhabits experienced. Personally I think Michael Katz does a great job at creating categories for poverty alleviating solutions providing a large amount of support when thinking of our group projects