The week we analyzed photography and the ways we can frame a
story was really intriguing. I decided I
wanted to do more research on other photographers who tried to tell the story
of poverty. One artist I found was
Stephen Shames through an article by the New York Times that was reviewing his
photographs. According to the New York
Times article, it was reviewed positively, stating that that his pictures were
able to capture the condition of poverty with children (http://www.nytimes.com/1993/07/30/arts/review-photography-poverty-among-america-s-children.html). The article argues that Stephen Shames had
successfully portrayed children in poverty because he had separated himself
from the photographs and had not tried to impose his individual feelings in the
photo. After I read this article, I decided to look up some of his photos and
use a GPP perspective to analyze his photos and make conclusions for myself. I decided to analyze this photo (6th
photo when you scroll down) by Stephen Shames in following website:http://www.arsivfotoritim.com/yazi/stephen-shames-ruyanin-disinda/. The photo is three poor children sharing a
mattress. Initially, my first thought
was how he had permission to get a photo of them sleeping, and how having a
photo of them sleeping portrays poverty.
If I had seen this photo in a different context, I may not have thought
it had to do with poverty. In this
respect, it makes the photo interesting since it isn’t the obvious “photo of
poverty” that is often portrayed on TV asking for donations. Maybe the point of the photo was not to
present poverty in the opposite way or a way that does not sensationalize their
condition. Through a new GPP lens, I
feel as a viewer I’m able to be more aware and more cautious of what story
people are trying to portray.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.