Check out this video on Vimeo to see just how much tech buses are using the 21-Hayes Bus Stop in the span of three hours on a given day.
In the past couple of years, San
Francisco has attracted many tech workers who want to stay in the city, especially
with the rise of tech companies such as Twitter, Yelp, and Pinterest planting
their headquarters in San Francisco. However, a sort of reverse commute is
happening as well-- usually, people commute from the suburbs into the city,
preferring a quieter (and cheaper) neighborhood over ones in the city, but the
opposite is now happening. San Francisco has become a magnet for the young and
wealthy millennials, many of which who work in Silicon Valley for the tech
industry. They want to live in the rich-in-culture and lively San Francisco but
work in Silicon Valley--35 miles away. In order to cater to these workers, some
tech companies, most notably Google whose shuttle system is known as the
"G Fleet," have begun providing shuttles to pick up workers around
San Francisco using public bus stops as their own.
According to
Google’s website, their G Fleet saves more than 20,000 metric tons of carbon
dioxide a year, which is “like taking about 4000 cars off the road or avoiding
71 million vehicle miles every year!” While this number is not specific to San
Francisco, it certainly highlights the benefits of Google buses. Who wouldn’t
want to get cars off the road? Who doesn’t want to save the environment? While
this all seems fine and dandy, there are some underlying implications to the G
Fleet in San Francisco.
First, Google
(and when I say Google, I am referring to all the tech shuttle buses in
general) buses, which brings around 14,000 workers from San Francisco to
Silicon Valley everyday, are eliminating people from the public transit system
and therefore funding for public transportation. So while tech workers enjoy
their fancy, wi-fi filled buses, San Franciscans may not receive enough money
to improve or repair their transportation. But wait! Google is donating
millions to that one program that provides free/reduced public transit bus
passes to the working class and low-income kids! Doesn’t that count for
anything? Although this may help, it could also be creating a “separate but
equal” bus system (a point that this article makes), deepening the divide
between those who take the Google bus and those using Google-subsidized bus
passes.
Secondly, Google
buses use public transportation system, which could clutter up the public
transportation system and create undue noise and traffic in neighborhoods where
buses stop. Furthermore, there is the question of who can actually stop at
public bus stops. Cars are fined $271 for parking at a stop, while these tech
buses pay absolutely nothing. However, San Francisco will begin implementing a
pilot program in July where buses will have to pay a dollar per stop, which is
projected to generate $1.5 million dollars.
Finally, buses
are intensifying gentrification in San Francisco by increasing rent and
property values near Google stops according to this study by UC Berkeley grad
student Alexandra Goldman. There have also been other studies that show that
transit development near houses in general increase their value. By increasing
housing around these areas, low-income people will find it more and more
difficult to live in San Francisco.
Although there
have been many protests and resistance against the tech industry in the past
year in San Francisco, tech companies are probably here to stay and so are tech
workers. Instead of fighting against them, I say that we work with them in
order to address everyone’s needs. Here are some of the more popular proposed
solutions I’ve read to solve the issue at hand:
- Charge companies more than a dollar to stop at public bus stops and use the money to fund affordable housing.
- Work with city metro centers to provide public transit for everyone from San Francisco to areas outside of the city.
- Change current public transportation from San Francisco to Silicon Valley (which would be Caltrain) so that tech workers would actually want to use it.
I’m not sure how feasible any of these solutions are or even how
effective they would be, but this guy makes a good point. Taking the Caltrain over
Google buses gives you a different perspective and gets you out of the tech
bubble. There’s a “rich sense of community” and a taste of the Bay Area—an
experience that even Google can’t offer.
The benefits of Google buses are persuading, and I would agree to many of the benefits that public transportation does. This past semester I have been taking a Public Health class that relates topics such as social capital, environment and other factors to the overall health (not just health as in the medical definition) of a community. Here, I would define health as liveliness and engagement of the community. A major factor that we also discussed was public transportation. Public transportation plays a large role in the participation of community members as well as increased access to resources.
ReplyDeleteIt would be interesting to see if Google buses will be able to help solve the large issues such as public housing. Although I think it may contribute, I think these are too large of issues that could be just solved with Google buses. It would be interesting to learn more about whether Google plans on forming partnerships with other organizations that more directly address the problems of public housing or environment concerns. I think this would bring greater legitimization to the goals and benefits of Google buses.