This evening, I attended a lecture in Sutardja Dai Hall by
the prolific artist, Stephanie Syjuco.
Syjuco displayed slides of her various projects from recent years,
ranging from creating counterfeit designer handbags to creating 3D prints of
antiquated Congolese vases. The
overarching theme stringing together her work is the “flow of things”. According to Syjuco, “in today’s world,
with the flow of goods comes the flow of ideas.” It is for this reason that I have chosen to review her
lecture In
recent decades, the shaping and attempt at alleviating poverty is shaped by the
technology that allows the flow of goods and ideas. Some call it neoliberalism, some call it global trade.
Either way, to deny globalization would be fallacy.
for the GPP Blog.
One of the projects that Syjuco conducted was taking a
“selfie”, and posting it on a website called Stock Share, which provides copyright-free
pictures that are used on public domains.
She then tracked the different websites that used her photo ranging from
Australian tourist sites to massage therapy. Through this project, Syjuco addresses the way that the
context behind images morph as they are stratified, which reminded me of the
treatment of photography on our Practice Experience. Because we will be immersed in our Practice Experiences, it
is easy to lose sight of the fact that people who will be viewing the photos we
take lack context. Therefore, it
is of the utmost importance that we keep in consideration that we are
responsible for the dispersal of portraits of people who will not be able to
speak about the portrait themselves.
This is a recurring theme that began in GPP 115. I think back to the GlobalPov videos
that show smiling images of impoverished children, in which Ananya rhetorically
asks, “Do people in poverty always smile this much?” This topic cropped up again during our pre-departure
orientation when we discussed Dorothea Lang’s photo of “Migrant Mother” and how
the subject of the photo was angry at the non-consentual nature of the
portrait. On my practice
experience, I anticipate that I may have some difficulty ensuring that the
photos I take are approved by the women I will be working with. I want them to fully understand where
these photos will be posted, and who will see them, but it may be difficult due
to cultural and language barriers.
Nevertheless, Stephanie Syjuco’s lecture sparked a renewed cognizance
that on our Practice Experience we are responsible for painting the global
portrait of poverty through our photography.
I's a lofty task to think of ourselves as fully responsible for providing the world with an accurate portrayal of the individuals in our practice experience. Something that I have really taken away from the course is Jenny's remarks that the course is not meant to answer all of our questions on poverty alleviation instead we are meant to question our work more. That being said, a photograph taken of individuals in my practice experience by me will not depicting the interrelational nature of our world today at its fullest capacity. The task to incorporate moments of suffering as well as agency in a globalized world is a task that is past my ability and so I am going into my practice experience knowing that my work will be incomplete as everyone else's is.
ReplyDelete